Overblog
Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog

Recherche

Archives

27 mai 2007 7 27 /05 /mai /2007 08:49
Forte croissance du nombre de salariés des Entreprises finlandaises à l'étranger en 10 ans. Une croissance de 150% entre 1996 et 2005, de 137 000 à 350 000 employés selon les statistiques de la Banque de Finlande.
La principale motivation de cette externalisation ou délocalisation de la production n'est pas l'attrait des pays à bas coût de production qui a une incidence forte sur les importations de la Finlande. 
Cette externalisation résulte d'une volonté de se rapprocher des marchés extérieurs afin de rendre plus acceptable la diffusion de produits d'origine finlandaise (notamment en Suède, aux Etats-Unis et dans les pays européens).

Rapid growth in ten years:
Finnish companies have 350,000 employees outside of Finland


Helsinki
Sweden 68,217
United States 37,477
Germany 33,716
China 21,490
Estonia 16,446
Russia 15,487
United Kingdom 15,076
Netherlands 14,308
France 14,099
Norway 13,778
Hungary 9,797
Poland 8,543
Italy 6,515
Denmark 6,437
Brazil 6,224
Austria 5,639
Canada 5,328
India 4,874
Lithuania 4,483
Mexico 3,656


Of the table

(27.05.2007 - Juhani Artto) In ten years, the number of employees in Finnish companies outside of Finland has grown rapidly. According to the Bank of Finland statistics (1), in 1996 there were 137,000 employees in the foreign subsidiaries and branches of companies resident in Finland. By 2005 the number had jumped by 150 per cent, to 351,000.

The top 50 list of Finnish companies (their global number of employees as the criteria) published by the economic weekly Talouselämä (2) contains data on the provision of their personnel working abroad. The list concerns the average situation in 2006.

Of the Finnish companies that were significant employers outside of
Finland one may form five, roughly equally large groups. They were as follows.

1. Nokia and its subcontractors

Changes, connected with the rise of Nokia which went on to become the world
's number one mobile telephone producer, play an important but not a decisive role in the growth of personnel abroad. Last year, Nokia's global personnel totalled 65,300 employees. Over 41,100 of them worked outside of Finland.

In 2006, Nokia
'
s three major Finnish based subcontractors Elcoteq, Perlos and Salcomp had 29,100 employees in their foreign units and subsidiaries. In Finland they had no more than 2,500 employees, which represented only a fraction of their domestic personnel just a few years ago.

And so Nokia with its Finnish based subcontractors represented approximately a fifth of the Finnish companies
'
personnel working outside of Finland.

2. Forest industry

Another fifth was formed by the forest industry giants Stora Enso,
UPM-Kymmene and Metsäliitto, all three having their main offices in Finland. In 2006, they had in their foreign units 67,400 employees. A fourth company Ahlström (specialty papers) may be added to this second group. In 2006, Ahlström had 4,900 employees outside of Finland.

3.Mechanical engineering

The third fifth can be identified in the mechanical engineering industry.
There, Kone (elevators), Metso (paper machines, mineral processing
equipments), Wärtsilä (diesel engines), Konecranes (cranes) and Cargotec (cargo handling solutions) had 65,000 employees in their branches and subsidiaries abroad.

4. Other manufacturing industries

A mixture of other manufacturing companies sums up the fourth group. Last year following ten companies, all based in Finland, had altogether 64,800 employees abroad: Huhtamäki (packaging), Fazer (bakery products, confectionery), Kemira (chemicals), Amer Sports (sports equipments), Atria (food), Fortum (power generation and distribution), Rautaruukki (steel), Outokumpu (stainless steel), Luvata (copper products) and Consolis (prefabricated concrete products).

5. Services, consulting, retailing

The remaining fifth covered various service providers, such as the construction industry companies YIT and Lemminkäinen, SanomaWSOY (media), Tieto-Enator (IT service provider), retailers Kesko, Stockmann and SOK, Sampo (insurance business), Eltel Networks (design, construction and maintenance of electrical and telecommunications networks) and Pöyry, the world
'
s leading forest industry consulting firm.
According to Talouselämä, in 2006, these ten companies had 63,600 employees in their foreign subsidiaries and branches.

Low labour costs have not been the most important factor

The motivation to expand personnel abroad has varied. In many businesses it is not possible to compete without having production units in several countries or on several continents. It means having production near the major markets and utilising strengths of different countries.

The Finnish trade union movement has mostly focused on cases where jobs have been removed from Finland to low pay countries. However, in most cases concerning Finnish investment abroad lower labour costs have not been among the major motives.

This can be concluded from Bank of Finland statistics (1) on the number of employees for foreign subsidiaries and branches of companies resident in Finland by country. The table below presents the top 20 countries in 2005. 's low pay countries, China has attracted direct investment from Finland primarily because of its vast and rapidly expanding markets.

Estonia's case is different from China. To some degree, direct investments in Estonia have been made to avail or take advantage of its low labour costs. This was the motivation, for example, of Nokia
's subcontractor Elcoteq which has been for many years been Estonia'
s largest exporter. In part has Finnish expansion into Estonia been motivated by Estonian markets.

Direct investments in Russia, have primarily been motivated by Russian
markets. The vast forest resources have also attracted Finnish capital. Only in a few minor cases have Russia
'
s low labour costs been the decisive factor in Finnish investment in Russia.

Hungary became the favourite country of Nokia and a few
other Finnish companies several years ago for their productive investments in Central and Eastern Europe. Low labour costs and social stability were Hungary
'
s assets among the former socialist countries in Central and Eastern Europe.

Direct investments in Poland have been motivated both by Poland
's domestic markets and its low labour costs.

In Latin America, Brazil has long time been the base of Finnish companies. There, Kone, Stora Enso and Nokia belong to the most important Finnish employers. The speciality has been Pöyry
'
s sizeable office that consults forest industries in the region.

The elevator company Kone and diesel engine manufacturer Wärtsilä have already seen many years of production in India. The units have targeted both India
'
s and larger Asian markets. Recently Nokia opened its first mobile telephone factory in India, followed by its major subcontractors. They produce primarily for the rapidly expanding Indian market.

Direct investments in Mexico include both Nokia
'
s and its subcontractors' factories. In these investments, the low pay factor plays a role.

All in all, the low pay level of developing countries and of countries in transition is more reflected in Finnish imports than in employment figures of Finnish companies
' foreign subsidiaries and branches. In this, textile, garment and shoe industries offer the best example. In the last three decades they have lost tens of thousands of jobs as a result of the low labour cost countries' better competitive ability. That is verified in the Finnish import statistics, not in the number of employees Finnish companies have abroad.

Major sources:
(excel)
Partager cet article
Repost0
26 mai 2007 6 26 /05 /mai /2007 15:29
p1030255.jpgp1030253.jpgp1030254.jpg
Partager cet article
Repost0
26 mai 2007 6 26 /05 /mai /2007 15:21
 
Claire Julliard
BORIS VIAN
FOLIO BIOGRAPHIES 384 pages, 16 ill. - 6,60 €
 
« Dans la vie, l'essentiel est de porter sur tout des jugements a priori. Il apparaît en effet que les masses ont tort, et les individus toujours raison. Il faut se garder d'en déduire des règles de conduite  ; elles ne doivent pas avoir besoin d'être formulées pour qu'on les suive. Il y a seulement deux choses : c'est l'amour, de toutes les façons, avec des jolies filles, et la musique de La Nouvelle-Orléans ou de Duke Ellington. »
Ingénieur, trompettiste de jazz, acteur, chanteur, parolier, pasticheur de romans noirs américains, critique, auteur de nouvelles et de pièces de théâtre, Boris Vian (1920-1959) ne fut jamais reconnu de son vivant pour ce qu'il était avant tout : un grand romancier au style exubérant, mêlant l'absurde à l'émotion, le paradoxe à la fantaisie. Auteur blessé de
L'Écume des jours, il meurt à trente-neuf ans, le 23 juin 1959.
 
BORIS VIAN [2007], 384 pages + 8 p. hors texte, 16 ill., sous couv. ill., 108 x 178 mm. Collection Folio biographies (No 21), Gallimard -bio. ISBN 9782070319633.
Parution : 15-02-2007.
 
Partager cet article
Repost0
25 mai 2007 5 25 /05 /mai /2007 11:05
Actes Sud publie la suite du Journal de Henry Bauchau. "Le présent d'incertitude" fait suite à "Passage de la bonne graine" (Actes Sud, 2002). Il accompagne les années 2002 à 2005 qui sont celles du roman "L'enfant bleu" (2004) et de la préparation du recueil de poêmes "Nous ne sommes pas séparés". (Actes Sud, 2006). 

Un site sur l'oeuvre de Henry Bauchau
http://bauchau.fltr.ucl.ac.be/
Le présent d'incertitude : journal 2002-2005 - Bauchau, Henry
Le présent d'incertitude : journal 2002-2005

 

23.00EUR

 

"Je suis un homme parmi des milliards d'hommes,
en communion peut-être avec d'autres artistes qui
ressentent en cet instant la même paix, la même
beauté, la même douleur sourde, l'incomplétude
qu'ils ont décidé de transformer en travail. Ce que
je comprends depuis peu, le travail importe plus
que l'oeuvre achevée."

H. B.

Parce qu'il est le lieu où se reflètent l'élaboration
de l'oeuvre mais aussi son contexte, parce qu'il
est également, dans les moments d'épreuve, le
moyen de reprendre pied dans l'écriture, le Journal
constitue un jalon privilégié dans la vie intérieure
de Henry Bauchau.

Par la chronologie, ce volume fait suite à Passage
de la Bonne-Graine (Actes Sud, 2002). Il accompagne
les années 2002 à 2005, qui sont notamment
celles du roman L'Enfant bleu (Actes Sud, 2004)
et du recueil de poèmes alors en préparation, Nous
ne sommes pas séparés (Actes Sud, 2006).

Editeur : Actes Sud
Nombre de pages : 313 p.
Format : Broché 22 x 12 cm
Parution : 02/04/2007

 

Partager cet article
Repost0
25 mai 2007 5 25 /05 /mai /2007 08:55
Wanja Lundby-Wedin a prononcé son premier discours de Présidente de la Confédération Européenne des Syndicats (CES,ETUC).
Elle a dénoncée la pensée unique qui prétend que l'Europe n'aurait plus les moyens de s'offir une protection sociale aussi élevée face à la compétition internationale. Elle a souligné que le développement de la protection sociale était l'un des moteurs de la compétitivité économique.
La fléxisécurité, tant vantée,suppose un équilibre entre sécurité et flexibilité. La sécurité des parcours professionnels est la condition de la mise en oeuvre des adaptations d'organisation de la production.
Le prix d'une économie européenne plus forte ne doit pas être payé uniquement par les salariés. Il faut partager les gains et les coûts d'une économie plus compétitive.
Elle souhaite que les syndicats européens soient consultés sur les politiques d'immigration et d'accueil des réfugiés. La protection des travailleurs sans papiers en développement dans toute l'Europe est une de ses priorités.


 Wanja Lundby-Wedin elected President of the ETUC

At the Congress of the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC), The LO President Ms. Wanja Lundby-Wedin, was elected president of the ETUC the 22:nd of May 2007. She will thus become the first women president of the ETUC as well as the first ETUC president from Sweden. LO became member of the ETUC when the organisation was founded in l973, and today ETUC organizes trade union organizations representing 60 million blue-collar workers, white-collar workers and university graduates in 35 countries.
After having been elected, Wanja Lundby-Wedin gave a speech of thanks in which she accentuated the need of a strong European trade union organisation which can intensify the welfare development in Europe.

At the same time, she questioned those who are of the opinion that to develop Europe economically, the welfare needs to be less generous, and she underlined that solid welfare systems facilitate the conversion to a more competitive economy.

- Everybody seems to praise flexicurity, but not everybody has accepted that this implies a labour market in which there is a balance between flexicurity and security. But without security, we will never accept flexicurity. If that will be the case, people will hang on to the jobs available as long as they can, and the pace of conversion will slow down. This is not positive to the European economy but it is typical. The price for a stronger European economy cannot be paid by the employees who will be periodically jobless. We must all, jointly, pay our share of the profits as well as the costs of a more competitive economy in Europe.

Wanja Lundby-Wedin was also critical to the inadequate migration and refugee policy of the European Union and underlined the importance of the union’s commitment to these issues.

- Today many people live in Europe without residence permits. They are forced to live on the fringe of society where they have no protection and can easily be exploited. The union ought to find ways of protecting them, and possibly organize the. Then, not only the conditions of these people would be improved, but also the economy of the black informal sector, which these people have to rely on in order to survive, would be dented.

 

Ladda ned

The Swedish model - Labour market with collective agreements - Security in transition 2007/05/22

The Swedish Model - Integration and ethnic discrimination 2007/05/22

The Swedish Model - Welfare 2007/05/22

The Swedish Model - Gender equality 2007/05/22

Partager cet article
Repost0
24 mai 2007 4 24 /05 /mai /2007 13:31
La Suédoise, Wanja Lundby-Wedin membre de L.O., vient d'être désignée à Séville Présidente de la Confédération Européenne des Syndicats.
Elle prononcera son premier discours de Présidente cet après midi au Congrès de la CES.

Wanja Lundby-Wedin nominated for ETUC President

19 European trade union confederations have nominated Wanja Lundby-Wedin, LO President, for President of the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC). No other candidates hade been nominated when the nomination term expired on Friday, February 16, 2007. It is the first time a women has been nominated for President of the ETUC.
The British TUC, German DGB and the Spanish UGT are among the organisations having nominated Wanja Lundby-Wedin. The ETUC President is elected for a period of four years. The election will take place at the ETUC Congress in Seville on May 21 – 24, 2007.

Partager cet article
Repost0
24 mai 2007 4 24 /05 /mai /2007 08:49
En attendant la décision de la Cour européenne de justice sur l'affaire Vaxholm en Suède, deux avis du 23 mai 2007 semblent conforter le droit des syndicats de faire respecter la législation du pays d'accueil  - en limitant toutefois ce droit  qui doit être motivé par l'intérêt publique et  la lutte contre le dumping social - pour les conditions de travail et de rémunération : l'un concerne directement l'affaire Vaxholm, l'autre un conflit en Finlande pour du personnel utilisé sur un ferry.
Le secrétaire général de la CES a accueilli favorablement la position des Avocats généraux de la Cour européenne de justice concernant les cas Laval et Viking. Il a déclaré :
texte integral

EU court upholds trade unions' rights
23.05.2007 - 12:49 CET | By Honor Mahony
EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - The European Court of Justice twice indicated on Wednesday (23 May) that it thinks there are limits to applying the principles of the internal market in the European Union.

In a highly anticipated opinion concerning the Swedish system of collective bargaining which sees industry and trade unions fix wages each year, the advocate general suggested trade unions have the right to take industrial action to compel companies from other member states to pay their workers the same wages as domestic workers receive under the collective agreements.


According to the court's top advisor, the bloc's internal market rules on the freedom to provide services do not prevent "trade unions from attempting, by means of collective action, to compel a service provider of another member state to subscribe to a rate of pay."

But the opinion cautions that the industrial action must "be motivated by public-interest objectives, such as the protection of workers and the fight against social dumping" and must be "proportionate."

The advocate general's opinion is not binding but in the majority of cases the final ruling, expected in the coming months, is similar.

The case concerned Latvian construction company Laval which in 2004 was hired to build a school in the Swedish city of Vaxholm. But the Swedish construction trade union, Byggnads, pressured Laval to sign the Swedish collective agreement on wages.

Laval refused saying its workers were operating under Latvian conditions, with lower wages. The conflict escalated with the Swedish trade unions putting the Latvian company under blockade and forcing the firm into bankruptcy.

In 2005, the "Vaxholm case" - brought by the Latvian company - was referred by the national court to the European Court to rule on questions of EU law.

The case was seen as test case for a deeply divisive issue in the EU - whether internal market rules should take precedence over rules seen as integral to a country's social model.

At the time, it prompted rash statements from both sides of fence with the internal market commissioner Charlie McCreevy saying that the collective agreements were against EU rules while the Swedish authorities insisted they were essential to the Swedish social model – regularly putting the country at the top of the league for both competitiveness and social inclusivity.

Some already see the opinion as a blow to the internal market.

"The court must not allow trade union blockades to dictate the terms of the EU single market," said British Conservative MEP Richard Ashworth.

"If we are to achieve our goals of more jobs and higher economic growth, we need to encourage competition, not force foreign companies to agree to collective agreements they never actually agreed to," he added.

However, green MEP Elisabeth Schroedter welcomed the opinion saying "the advocate general has indicated that cross-border service provision cannot result in a race to the bottom in terms of wages."

Finnish case
In a separate, less publicised, case the court on Wednesday delivered a similar preliminary view on collective action.

This opinion involved a Finnish ferry company which reflagged its vessel to Estonia in order to take on more Estonian workers for lower wages than their Finnish counterparts.

The advocate general in this case said that trade unions may take collective action to dissuade a company from relocating within the EU in order to pay staff lower rates of pay.

He also suggested that public interests relating to social policy and fundamental rights may justify certain restrictions of movement "as long as they do not go beyond what is necessary."

Both opinions will be followed by the final court verdicts in the coming months.

© 2007 EUobserver, All rights reserved

Partager cet article
Repost0
24 mai 2007 4 24 /05 /mai /2007 08:24
www.zanorg.com/nicoshark

Un blog ouvert le 6 mai dernier commente sous forme d'une bande dessinée l'actualité politique française.
Plutôt bien vu, la mise en oeuvre par un petit chef du personnel du catalogue des recettes de management des entreprises et de gestion du personnel qui étaient à la mode au début des années 1990 en France.
Rien de nouveau sous le soleil, Nicolas Sarkozy recycle en politique les ficelles du patronat français qui singeaient les méthodes américaines avec quelques années de retard.
Partager cet article
Repost0
22 mai 2007 2 22 /05 /mai /2007 20:49
31/01/06
La CES soutient la lutte des syndicats suédois en faveur du mantien des conditions de salaire et de travail négociées
L’issue du cas Laval (Vaxholm), actuellement devant la Cour européenne de justice (CEJ), revêt une importance cruciale pour le mouvement syndical européen et le bien-être des travailleurs de toute l’UE. Si l’entreprise lettone de construction Laval gagne, le droit des partenaires sociaux à conclure des conventions collectives et à préserver les normes de travail sera irrémédiablement compromis. 

La Confédération européenne des syndicats (CES) soutient la confédération syndicale suédoise LO et le syndicat suédois des travailleurs de la construction (SBWU) dans leur lutte pour le maintien des taux de rémunération et des conditions de travail négociées, dans leur propre pays.

Erland Olauson, vice-président de LO Sweden affirme : “Nous n’acceptons aucune forme de discrimination entre les travailleurs sur le marché du travail suédois. Il est absurde d’accepter un système dans lequel des salaires différents s’appliquent au même emploi en raison de la nationalité du travailleur.”

La vérité sur l’affaire Laval

Comme l’affirme l’ancien dicton attribué à Saint Ambroise : “A Rome, il faut vivre comme les Romains.” Ignorant ce conseil, l’entreprise de construction lettone Laval a tenté d’imposer ses propres salaires et conditions de travail à des travailleurs "détachés" qui rénovaient une école à Vaxholm près de Stockholm, fragilisant ainsi les normes suédoises en matière d’emploi.

Lorsqu’il s’est rendu à Stockholm, en octobre, le Commissaire européen Charlie McCreevy a tancé les syndicats et le gouvernement suédois et a approuvé les conditions de travail des travailleurs lettons sur les lieux de travail suédois.

Selon un principe fondamental de l’UE, chaque Etat membre a le droit de réglementer ses propres marchés de l’emploi et ses systèmes de relations industrielles en fonction de situations économiques, sociales et politiques différentes.

Il est admis dans le monde entier que le modèle de travail nordique est une réussite. La CES estime que toute restriction au droit d’action collective, ou interférence avec des systèmes de relations industrielles, sera interprétée comme une attaque, non seulement contre ce modèle mais aussi contre les droits fondamentaux du travail en général et contre le modèle social européen. Ce n’est pas ainsi que l’on regagnera la confiance des citoyens européens et que l’on relancera la Constitution. La Commission doit donc être très prudente et adopter une approche équilibrée dans ses déclarations à la Cour européenne de justice concernant le cas Laval.

L’Europe n’est pas seulement un marché unique, c’est aussi une communauté qui partage de fortes valeurs sociales” déclare le Secrétaire général de la CES, John Monks. “Ce cas a une grande importance politique, car si les syndicats européens perdent, le risque est réel de voir les travailleurs s’opposer à la libre circulation, au marché unique et à l’UE elle-même.”

Cette affaire est également étroitement liée à la directive « services ». Elle démontre pourquoi la réglementation dans le pays d’accueil joue un rôle aussi essentiel dans la prévention du dumping social et la promotion de l’harmonisation vers le haut des niveaux de vie et des normes de travail.

Il est important de noter que la Suède est un des trois pays de l’UE qui n’a pas imposé de phases transitoires à la libre circulation des travailleurs à la suite de l’élargissement, le 1er mai 2004. Elle estimait que son modèle national de relations industrielles serait suffisamment fort pour faire face aux défis.

Informations complémentaires

Patricia Grillo Responsable de la Presse et de la Communication Tél. : + 32 (0)2 224 04 30. GSM : + 32 (0)477 77 01 64 E mail : Pgrillo@etuc.org

Johan Hall Attaché de presse de LO Suède GSM : + 46 (0) 70 649 26 06


 
 
Partager cet article
Repost0
22 mai 2007 2 22 /05 /mai /2007 20:02

La Cour Européenne de Justice va se prononcer sur un conflit opposant le gouvernement suédois à une entreprise qui utilisait des ouvriers lettons pour la construction d'un établissement scolaire à Vaxholm.
Le litige porte sur la règlemention à appliquer celle du pays où les travaux sont effectués - position du gouvernement suédois social-démocrate à l'époque des faits - ou celle du pays d'origine des ouvriers selon le souhait de l'entreprise.
Cette décision aura des conséquences très importantes pour le Droit du Travail dans tous les pays de l'Union européenne.
ci-dessous articles de EU-Observer et de Dagens Nyheter

Brussels awaits crucial labour rules case
22.05.2007 - 08:56 CET | By Honor Mahony
EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - Policy makers in Brussels are waiting with keen interest to hear a preliminary ruling this week in a court case that could have major implications for the EU's social model.

On Wednesday (21 May), the advocate general at the European Court of Justice will give an opinion in a case that is eventually likely to clear up several key questions in EU law and workers rights.


These include whether minimum wages are a question for the national or European level - in this case whether the Scandavian industry-trade union wage deals take precedence over EU internal market rules; whether EU laws restrict workers and trade unions' rights to take collective action and whether member states are permitted to take steps to prevent so-called "social-dumping."

The advocate general's opinion is not binding but in the majority of cases the final verdict of the court - expected in the coming months - is similar.

The case concerns Latvian construction company Laval which in 2004 was hired to build a school in the Swedish city of Vaxholm. But the Swedish construction trade union, Byggnads, pressured Laval to sign the Swedish collective agreement between industry and trade unions on wages and conditions for the sector.

Laval refused saying its workers were operating under Latvian conditions, with lower wages. The conflict escalated with the Swedish trade unions putting the Latvian company under blockade and forcing the firm into bankruptcy.

In 2005, the "Vaxholm case", brought by the Latvian company, was referred to the European Court to rule on questions of EU law.

Internal market rules versus social standards
At the time, the Latvian-Swedish dispute attracted huge media attention, appearing to sum up the heated emotion surrounding the controversial Brussels law on establishing an internal market in services, which was going through the EU legislative pipelines at the time.

Opponents of the law, which has since been watered down, said that its cornerstone "country of origin" principle allowing service providers to set up in other member states using their domestic rules would result in a downward spiral of wages and social security.

The same type of rhetoric has surrounded the Vaxholm case, with the dividing line being whether countries think EU internal market rules are more important or whether certain minimum social rules override free market principles.

The European Commission's internal market chief, Charlie McCreevy, a champion of deregulation and free markets, also waded into the debate telling Stockholm at the time that he thought the country's collective wage agreements breached EU laws on the freedom of movement.

For its part, Sweden says these collective agreement are an essential part of its social model, which regularly sees the country top the scales in competitiveness but also for social inclusiveness.

European trade unions will be watching the Luxembourg-based court very carefully on Wednesday too, believing that the case will define whether Europe is more than just its internal market.

"The case is very important," European trade union confederation chief John Monks told EUobserver, claiming to have the support of 19 of the 27 EU governments for his stance on the case.

Speaking about trade unions positions he said, "we welcome people but do not want them to be doing something that would be regarded as damaging the interests of the domestic population – that way lies social tension."

© 2007 EUobserver, All rights reserved 
Article publié dans Dagens Nyheter le 20 mai 2007

EU ger Vaxholmsbesked i veckan
LO:s advokater, Svenskt Näringsliv och den lettiska regeringen väntar alla spänt på beskedet från Luxemburg i veckan. Då ger EU-domstolens generaladvokat sitt förslag till dom i den infekterade Vaxholmskonflikten.
 
 
Fakta
 
Vaxholmsblockaden
 
Det var heta känslor i november 2004 när de svenska facken med Byggnads i spetsen blockerade det lettiska företaget Lavals dotterbolag som vunnit upphandlingen om ombyggnaden av en skola i Vaxholm. Förhandlingarna om kollektivavtal hade avslutats utan framgång och Byggnads blockadvakter ropade "go home" efter de lettiska arbetarna.

Frågan landade i januari i år i EU:s domstol i Luxemburg och i veckan kommer utlåtandet från domstolens generaladvokat. Det är ett slags förslag till domslut som ska vägleda men inte binda domstolen. Och LO:s avtalssekreterare Erland Olauson känner sig, precis som motparten Laval, ganska säker på framgång på onsdag.

- Det grundläggande inom EU är att man inte får diskriminera på grund av nationalitet och det gäller både företag och arbetstagare. Och därför måste generaladvokaten komma fram till att det inte finns en skyldighet enligt EU-rätten att diskriminera utländska arbetstagare som tillfälligt kommer till Sverige, utan ge dem samma skydd som vi ger svenska arbetstagare, säger Olauson till TT.

I den heta Vaxholmsfrågan finns många åsikter. Men i Sverige finns ganska få. LO och socialdemokraterna ställer helhjärtat upp bakom Byggnads. Och, kanske något överraskande, även den svenska borgerliga regeringen. Dess ombud i EG-domstolen argumenterade för samma inlaga som den socialdemokratiska arbetsmarknadsministern Hans Karlsson en gång lämnat till domstolen.

I Sverige finns egentligen bara Svenskt Näringsliv som är kritiskt till den fackliga argumentationen. Och förstås lettiska Lavals svenska ombud Anders Elmér som hävdar att de fackliga stridsåtgärderna och avtalskraven är ett hinder för den fria rörligheten. Elmér pekar också på att svenska konsumenter kan tjäna mycket pengar på skärpt konkurrens.

Samtidigt understryker Elmér att han inte vill stjälpa den svenska modellen utan reformera den så att den passar i en ny värld. Och Elmér tycker att hans plädering i Luxemburg fick ett bra mottagande.

- Jag tycker vi fick gehör för våra ståndpunkter, även i viss mån från länder som vi inte hade väntat oss. Till exempel Tyskland, de anglosaxiska länderna och även från kommissionen, säger Elmér som nu räknar med att få stöd från generaladvokaten på onsdag i nästa vecka.

- Jag tror att vi kommer att få en viss framgång. Det skulle förvåna mig om generaladvokaten till hundra procent accepterar det system som Sverige för närvarande tillämpar, säger Elmér till TT.

Totalt var det hela femton EU-länder som hade åsikter om Vaxholmsfrågan under pläderingarna i domstolen i januari i år. De flesta av de stora EU-länderna står också bakom Byggnads. Men Charlie McCreevy, kommissionär med ansvar för EU:s inre marknad, har varit skarpt kritisk mot Byggnads och sagt att han ser den svenska hanteringen av konflikten som ett brott mot unionens fördrag.

Samtidigt är det osannolikt att generaladvokatens utlåtande blir ett entydigt stöd åt någon av parterna.

- Vi kommer troligen inte att få ett besked om huruvida Byggnads gjorde rätt eller fel. Men vi kommer så småningom att få en förklaring från domstolen av vad EG-rätten innebär och sedan ska Arbetsdomstolen i Sverige med den ökade kunskapen avgöra målet, säger Erland Olauson.
 
Partager cet article
Repost0